Saturday, December 1, 2012

The History Of The Great Need For Patents

Study regarding the extensive and vibrant history of patents is significant. It would be simple and easy for individuals to assume that patents are a fairly current advancement, but that could not be more wrong. In fact, it is considered that the first known patent is thought to have been granted in Venice, Italy in the 12th century. These earliest known patents were primarily 10 year monopolies released to the inventors of a silk weaving process.

By the 14th century, the English had developed a process wherein the Crown awarded special privileges to inventors which allowed them sole use of their invention until it became a viable industry. The earliest known patent under this system was granted in 1449 to a glass making procedure used by Venetian Glass makers. The patent was granted for a duration of 20 years.

It is very important note the difference between those 14th century patents and the patents of today. Those first patents made no distinction between inventors and those who merely imported new techniques to their country to decrease their dependence on imports. By giving patents to entrepreneurial importers, England took an essential step in recognizing that the innovative technologies imported to their country would produce jobs and enhance their economy.

The earliest legal statues included in governments about Patents were in the Republic of Venice in 1474. This statute acknowledged that new inventions had to be documented with the Republic as a way to achieve legal protection against potential infringers. This early statute laid down the standard principles of today's Patent Law. Inventions had to be both new and useful, the rights provided for the inventor were exclusive, the Patent was requested a limited time, and those who infringed on the patent could possibly be instructed to cease and desist all rivalling inventions relating to the Patent.

At the same time, England's Patent method was becoming particularly corrupt. The Crown offered Patent privileges to individuals they deemed worthy, because this became a very good way of raising funds. This practice generated unhappiness amongst inventors as the Crown awarded their monopolies to chosen inventors in exchange for a sum of money. Eventually, King James the 1st cancelled all established patent privileges to opt for the 1623 statute of monopolies which granted monopolies only to new inventions and was enforceable for a limited amount of time.

The system of approving patents was primarily busy throughout the Industrial revolution, leading the practice to be adopted by other countries. The first United States Patent laws were introduced in 1790 with France following in 1791. In 1883, patent laws were internationalized during the signing of the Paris Convention.

The essential premises of current patent law have been in place for over 400 years. This is not so incredible as you think about the awesome leaps and strides in technology over those 400 years. Even the past 50 years we have observed computers and the Internet and digital photography and cellular phone service definitely change the way our society lives.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   Why You Need a Loan Modification Attorney When Your House Is On The Line   Intellectual Property Lawyers and How to Tackle IP Litigation   

Denial of Trademark Registration

When applying for a trademark you may run into some difficulties that may cause your trademark application to be denied. If you still face denial of your application, you have options to appeal the decision.

Reasons for the Denial of a Trademark Application

If you submit an incomplete or poorly developed application, you are almost guaranteed to receive a denial. Your trademark attorney can help you draft your application to avoid this pitfall, but there are several other issues that can result in the denial of an application.

The most common reasons for trademark denials include:

the presence of a similar, pre-existing trademark already registered; your mark is too generic; your mark consists of immoral, disparaging, or deceptive matter; your mark contains the name, image, or signature identifying a living individual without their written consent; your mark contains the name, image, or signature of a deceased President of the United States while his widow is still alive, unless consent is given by the widow;and the mark is used solely as a trade name.

How to Respond to the Denial of a Trademark Application

If your trademark application is denied you will receive notice from the USPTO in the form of an Office Action. The notice of denial will include reasons for the decision, which your trademark attorney can review and discuss with you. You are given a written notice of the time you have in which to submit a response to the decision, typically 6 months.

At this time, your trademark attorney can help you investigate the reasons for the denial of your trademark application. This information is a critical part of formulating your response, as it needs to address the problems cited in the denial notice.

After your initial response to the denial of your trademark application is filed, the USPTO will issue another decision. Should you receive a subsequent denial, you will need to reformulate the mark before reissuing a response.

Hiring a California Trademark Attorney

It's important to have the guidance of a professional when you are applying for a trademark. Having the advice of a trusted trademark attorney from the start will help you avoid errors in the trademark application process and avoid immediate denial. If you find yourself facing denial of your application, attorneys can help you determine the cause and help rectify it in your response.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   Why You Need a Loan Modification Attorney When Your House Is On The Line   

Why IP Lawyers Need to Have Effective Relationship Management Skills to Survive

The 20th Annual Survey of General Counsel published in the August 2010 issue of Inside Counsel ('What's Going On In Today's Legal Departments') has some significant pointers for IP legal services professionals who want to attract good clients and keep them on board for years.

First of all, it identifies IP legal services as one of 5 practice areas that increased in volume despite the turbulent economic conditions, with the comment "IP has become more important to everybody, whether it's GM and whether [its employees] are authorized to use the word Chevy... or my company protecting creative rights for fashion." - Lorraine Koc, vice president and general counsel, Deb Shops.

Secondly, the figures cited highlight the opportunities IP legal services professionals have to attract really good clients IF they take action to address some of the concerns in-house counsels have. Key figures to consider include:

Only 40.9% of law firms understand their business. Truly shocking! I have written a bit about the need to know the conversation going on in your prospect's /client's mind, and suspect that this figure is low because too many lawyers have no proper processes and systems to find out what their clients are really looking for. Even worse, they probably make no effort to learn about their client's business. Almost 65% on in-house counsels don't believe law firms actively seek ways to reduce costs. Many IP legal services professionals don't want to reduce costs because of the time they spend on various activities which they want to bill for. However, if IP legals services professionals systemised their client client attraction activity (as an example), some of the costs they subsequently quote could be reduced because of the reduced overheads. By proactively discussing costs with clients, IP legal services professionals can stand out when compared to those that simply don't want to be flexible enough to discuss costs. 51% of law firms fail to recognise their clients' budget constraints. First of all, I want to repeat something I have mentioned below. You do not want to be the IP legal services professional that is known as the lowest priced service provider in the market. That will kill your reputation and your business. Clients will always pay for value, but IP legal services professionals do need to consider the reduced budgets many of the clients have. Providing a hybrid model of fixed and billable-by-the-hour price plans, and perhaps thinking more about multi-year managed service options gives astute IP legal services professionals the opportunity to show their willingness to explore various pricing options.

If you have not read the report, do so now. The key figure to take away, and which hammers home the opportunities available for lawyers, is the fact that 31.5% of in-house counsels are unhappy with their current law firm relationships.

How that breaks down for the IP legal services sector is not clear. But if we assume - and I appreciate this is a BIG assumption - that 30% of in-house counsels are looking for a new IP legal services provider, then clearly there is a lot of business out there that needs to be won. Remember, IP legal services is one of the top 5 growth practices according to the survey.

If that is the case, you need to be smart about the way you go about trying to win new IP legal services business. Repeating old mistakes such as cold calling, running seminars to prospects you have built no relationship with, or failing to build trust by providing information that your prospects are looking for (without giving direct legal advice of course) will mean you simply repeat the mistakes made by law firms that many businesses are already unhappy with.

And this extends to smaller businesses that still need crucial IP legal services advice but where relationships are with owners themselves, or where there is no in-house legal counsel to deal with. With smaller prospects and clients, the problems associated with budgets are multiplied many times over. They simply don't have the huge corporate budgets to play around with, and relationships here can be even more personal.

What this survey highlights is the need to understand customer life time values, and to make sure you have systems and processes to manage the various stages in relationships you have with prospects and clients. How you win clients determines the value they attach to the relationship with you. So what do IP legal services professionals need to do?

Right from the start, you need to find out the conversation going on in your prospect's mind, and provide information that points them towards a solution or shows them how they can get rid of any frustrations they have. You need a platform to systemise your communications with prospects, and allow them to give you feedback so you you don't make assumptions about what they need. This allows you to develop trust with prospects and lets them get to know you via reports, seminars, newsletters, etc. You want them to make the informed choice to select you above all other options available in the IP legal services market. You have to create a value proposition that takes into account the budget constraints many potential /current clients have. Think about the value of having a managed services offering, which guarantees fees over a given period of time and helps you plan your practice growth better. This means changing some internal structures so that you outsource non-core activities and focus on the stuff that clients value most, After all, that is what you trained for. For many IP legal services practices and solo practitioners, outsourcing of certain functions/activities is a great opportunity to reduce costs. All this, however, comes from understanding what your clients really need and making sure you have the flexibility, without killing your business, to deliver a great service.

Is all this simple? No, but the key thing to remember is this. Great marketing is not about coming up with the latest, fantastic idea. It needs, to be blunt, tried and tested systems that have worked already. More important though, success comes not from simply reading about such systems, but taking action to implement them. Once you have them in place, you will find yourself spending twice as much time dealing with customers that want to work with you and subsequently increase your income.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   Why You Need a Loan Modification Attorney When Your House Is On The Line   Intellectual Property Lawyers and How to Tackle IP Litigation   

Ways To Protect Your Own Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property is term commonly used nowadays but only few people have really grasped its meaning. Not too many people understand the legalities involved. Intellectual Property is any intangible asset that consists of human knowledge and ideas. This includes patents, copyrights, trademarks and software. Wherever you are in the world, it is necessary for an individual, a business or an organization to protect and secure its trademark or identifiers. It is powerful in the sense that it can bring in economic growth and increase wealth; may it be for an individual or a business.

Vast information is rising and technology has been constantly evolving. Anything can go wrong since abuses to one's trademark are inevitable. So being online means grasping the challenges of intellectual property: to protect what may be one of your major assets and respecting the rights of intellectual property owners and users.

Be always on the lookout to protect your own interests. A responsible intellectual property owner must conduct a review of his or her intellectual property assets constantly.

Here are some tips to secure what it rightfully yours.

1. Registration - Get your ideas, trademark, or patent registered.

2. Invest in getting legal advice

3. Research and read - Although it is best to listen to what your lawyer has to say, it is still smart to bone up on knowledge regarding intellectual property.

4. Portray a complete image - See to it that you have already considered all the angles involved in your concept before you let the whole world know about it. A good deal of planning with thorough research is very significant.

5. Respect the work and ideas of others - The idea of others may help you in formulating your own trademark but see to it that your concept is all original. As much as you want to protect what is your intellectual property, others are also securing their own.

6. Get real! - It does not come hand in hand that when you have an idea, it will be a great success. It takes an extra mile of effort to make the brand a success.

7. Be competitive - You may not have a competition now but others may come up with the same concept in the near future. So why will you put off protecting your brand. Legal protection will give you the chance to participate in entrepreneurship seminars where you can learn more marketing strategies.

8. Non-disclosure Agreement - This document is necessary to ensure that business partners or new hires will keep the company's trade secrets protected.

9. Legal Security - The national government has existing laws that increasingly recognizes the value of intellectual property and is taking steps to protect your rights of ownership.

10. Have patience - Continue to develop your concept while the license or copyright to your trademark is being processed. This process takes time but our trademark lawyers are here to assist you and make things as convenient as possible.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   Why You Need a Loan Modification Attorney When Your House Is On The Line   Intellectual Property Lawyers and How to Tackle IP Litigation   

Why You Should Review Your Commercial Arrangements Now: Part 1

Why review existing commercial contracts?

There is a great variety of reasons why a business would seek to renegotiate or terminate some of its existing commercial arrangements. This may include: (1) the need for a business to improve its financial situation or to avoid falling victim to the financial difficulties of its business partners; (2) a business strategy to renegotiate the price or to exit from an unprofitable agreement, without incurring the cost of litigation or, as in the recent case of the UK government; (3) the wish to centralize its spending, benchmark its suppliers and achieve costs savings and of course; (4) the need to align contracts with legal requirements and business direction. However, this exercise should be carried out bearing in mind that the reason is to make savings and achieve efficiencies and not to jeopardize or damage a good commercial relationship. Whatever the reasons, the assessment should consider all the business arrangements including the supply and purchase contracts with key customers and suppliers and back-office contracts, such as purchasing and outsourcing arrangements, facilities management, logistics, IT support and maintenance contracts.

Where to start

Firstly, you should start by:

1) Reviewing the entire agreement pool, 2) Identifying the agreements that need to be reviewed and 3) Highlighting existing clauses in such agreements, for example, benchmarking, continuous improvement, exclusivity and minimum purchase obligations that you may be able to use to start the renegotiation.

Then you would move to renegotiate the individual terms, such as the price or the scope of the goods or services with the help of you adviser in order to avoid any claim by the other party for breach of contract.

Depending on how strong (or not) your renegotiation base is, you could of course just rely on commercial considerations and either:

1) Renegotiate; 2) Terminate the relationship as a whole; or 3) Negotiate a staged exit, lesser commitment.

It is good to remember that when you look for an "agreement" with a customer/supplier, that not all contracts may be documented in one document. The terms of the relationship may arise from various arrangements, so gather the facts and understand how they interact among themselves before progressing with the review. At this point, it is essential that any review and update is taken having first taken advice from your legal advisor in order to avoid any claims for breach of contract.

In particular, consider:

-Signed or draft agreements (which have been used between the parties for some time); -Any course of dealing between businesses over a period of time; -Exchanges of correspondence, including e-mails; -Implied terms; for example, even if there are no service level agreements or key performance indicators, the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 requires the service provider to use reasonable care and skill; -The parties' conduct, which may constitute the contract or vary its terms; for example, always accepting payment after 60 days instead of the 30 days set out in the contract. -The other side's terms and conditions; -Schedules, side letters and letters of comfort; -Invitations to tender (ITTs), responses to tender and unfinished agreements.

Considerations for customers

Always, consider using the contract terms to commercial advantage. If, for example, the contract does not specify purchasing exclusivity and there is no requirement to buy a minimum amount from that particular supplier, consider dual sourcing from a cheaper supplier instead of terminating.

Considerations for suppliers

A supplier may wish to consider the following:

- Review credit limits with existing customers as well as under taking credit searches against new customers to ensure that the level of credit is appropriate to the financial standing of the customer. In these tougher times, such credit limits need constant review. Bear in mind that the information received may be out of date. - Where appropriate, include retention of title clause or ensure that your current clause works effectively. If your customer becomes insolvent, an effective retention of title clause may be the only way that you will realistically recover or part-recover the debt or your goods. - Insist on a guarantee from the directors or the parent company, if there is concern over any new customer's credit rating. If the customer becomes insolvent, you can seek recovery from the guarantor. However, ensure that all available checks are carried out against such would-be guarantors; otherwise the guarantees may not be worth the paper they are written on. - Consider entering into a factoring agreement or taking out credit insurance to improve your client's cash flow, especially as many customers are paying their suppliers late to improve their own cash flow positions. - Check invoicing and payment terms and put in place a strategy to enforce them. Seek to negotiate more favourable terms and then enforce them. - Check your contractual right to terminate or suspend the arrangement, if, for example, the customer becomes insolvent or fails to pay on time or at all.

This articles is for general purposes and guidance only and do not constitute legal or professional advice.

Copyright 2010 Anassutzi & Co Limited. All rights reserved. Information may be shared or reproduced only if accompanied by the author's name and bio.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   Why You Need a Loan Modification Attorney When Your House Is On The Line   

Public Domain

The public domain, as what has been defined in the context of intellectual property rights is a concept that refers to any works, creations, ideas or information that has nothing to do with authorization and legal protection anymore. Indeed one of the best ways people refer to when they write something or perhaps when they do their researches is by the aid of acquiring information, data's or information in the content of the so-called public common.

Because of a wide range of available content in it, you can just explore and acquire knowledge as long as you want and as many as you can, just taking consideration that in the premise of an academic institutions and other professional establishments "plagiarism" is a negative action. But other than that, the public sphere or the domain that we are talking abut in this discourse can help you big time for future reference.

One of the best ways to get started writing your articles is by using public domain content. There is a surprisingly large amount of content available, which exists in the public domain - meaning, there are no copyrights claimed on the content, and you are free to do whatever you want with it. Now the fact that public sphere is accessible to the public means you do not need to pay anything consuming all your desired information, creation, works and ideas. Moreover, if you are good perhaps you can find a goldmine of information that might be a good source of new income. Who knows? Just be creative, no one knows how to get it unless you take the risk.

So what else should you need to know about public domain? Yes, you might want to ask about those works that exist just before the copyright law and patent laws take into action, are they covered in the public domain? Fortunately yes! Therefore, you need not to hold your breath just in case you want some significant data's coming from this span of time.

Another frequently asked question that is in relation to this discourse is the expiry date of a copyright law to be open for public viewing. Most specifically according to the governing body that encompasses this law, in United States, they particularized the agreements of the number of years following the publication or sometimes creation of a certain work. However, this number of years varies from one country to the other but the average range is between 50-70 years. This has been asserted to increase by some legislators of various countries.

Now that you have enough knowledge about public domain, you can now explore and re-discover works that has been limited to few people before, if you still want some more please follow the link in the resource box below.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   

Ambush Marketing and the FIFA World Cup

At the FIFA World Cup 2010, "Ambush Marketing" was again in the headlines.

"Ambush Marketing" stands for a special kind of marketing campaign where companies cleverly connect their goods or brands with a popular, often athletic, event, such as the World Cup. Ambushers often try to catch a free ride by paying no sponsorship fees but making consumers believe they are official sponsors of the event. From a legal point of view, Ambush Marketing ranges from creative strategies that do not break any law to clearly illegal uses of logos, phrases, slogans and the like.

Sports as a prime target

McDonald's was the official sponsor of the Beijing Olympics. But in the lead-up to the games, KFC used the marketing slogan "I love Beijing", while Pepsi replaced its usual blue cans with red ones "to show their respect for the year of China".

During the 1996 Atlanta Olympic Games, referring to their new mobile phone, Telecom New Zealand Ltd was successful with an ambush advertisement containing the word "ring" (for the sound of a ringing phone) arranged five times like the Olympic rings and in the Olympic colours.

McDonald's was also at work during the 2006 FIFA World Cup. Its Austrian advertising campaign showed the Federal Chancellor Wolfgang Schssel holding up a red-white-red scarf (the colours of the Austrian flag) saying "AUSTRIA IS WORLD CHAMPION".

The 2010 FIFA World Cup

For the 2010 World Cup, FIFA had its hands full trying to ensure that only official sponsors advertised their brands in connection with the event.

The Dutchy girls

They were all over the media - the 36 women who attended the Netherlands - Denmark match in South Africa wearing matching orange dresses emblazoned with the "Dutchy" beer logo. Bavaria brewery supplied the dresses for promotional purposes during the FIFA World Cup. The trouble is, Bavaria was not an official World Cup 2010 sponsor; Budweiser, a competitor, was. The stunt was a fine example of unlawful Ambush Marketing. The women were escorted out of the stadium but the goal (and then some) had been accomplished: increased exposure of Bavaria's trademark without having to pay official sponsorship fees.

Kulula Air

Kulula, a South African airline who was not an official sponsor, placed ads with the slogan: "UNOFFICIAL NATIONAL CARRIER OF THE 'YOU-KNOW-WHAT'". In the ad the national flag, footballs and a special kind of plastic horn used by South African fans at soccer matches (the so called "vuvuzela") were shown. Kulula is generally known in South Africa for its humorous advertising. According to various reports on the internet, FIFA warned Kulula that the combined use of these attributes created an unauthorised association with the event and was illegal.

Kulula reacted to the warning by placing new ads with the slogan "NOT NEXT YEAR, NOT LAST YEAR, BUT SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN". The new ad shows a bridge resembling the Cape Town World Cup stadium and golf tees looking like vuvuzela with the accompanying text "Definitely, definitely a golf tee", and other pictures with humorous remarks.

Although all such activities may be considered Ambush Marketing in the advertising sense, from a legal point of view we need to differentiate.

Direct v. indirect ambush marketing

Direct Ambush Marketing activities, such as the unauthorised, illegal use of a registered logo on merchandising goods, or a false or misleading claim to be an official sponsor of an event, clearly constitute infringements.

Indirect Ambush Marketing, on the other hand, is more subtle and falls within a legal grey area. Mercedes' indirect Ambush Marketing campaign at the New York City Marathon 1997 is famous. Although Toyota was the official automotive partner of the marathon, Mercedes had its name written in the sky above the event by aeroplanes.

Another example is Media Markt's "We will get the title" campaign at the 2006 FIFA World Cup in Germany, or the previously mentioned KFC slogan "I love Beijing".

Smart indirect ambushers link the sponsored activity to their brand without violating trademark or copyright rights. The question is whether the campaign leads to unlawful consumers associations or other infringements, such as unfair competition.

Trademark protection

Ambushing clearly breaches intellectual property laws when trademarks are used without a contractual right or licence and trademark rights are infringed. According to the Austrian Trademark Protection Act (Markenschutzgesetz; MSchG) not only the use of an identical sign but also the use of a similar sign with a likelihood of confusion may be illegal. The protection of trademarks with reputation is even stronger. The owner of a trademark with reputation may request third parties to refrain from using an identical or similar sign for goods or services which are not similar to those protected under the trademark.

Unfair competition

Complementary to trademark law, designated regulations of the Austrian Act against Unfair Competition (Gesetz gegen Unlauteren Wettbewerb; UWG) supplement intellectual property law. Unfair business activities include misleading business practices (Sec 2 UWG), imitation marketing of corporate brands (Sec 9 UWG) and other unfair business practices falling within the general clause of Sec 1 UWG. Furthermore, according to the Austrian Supreme Court, an unfair exploitation of the good reputation of an event or false allegations in advertisements misleading the public about the status of the ambusher as an official sponsor may be considered as unfair competition.

Copyrights and personal rights

Intellectual creations in the area of literature, photography, music and art enjoy (without registration) copyright protection under the Austrian Copyright Act (Urheberrechtsgesetz; UrhG). Personal rights such as the right to one's own image may also be violated by an advertising campaign (see the previous Chancellor Schssel example).

Remedies

To the holder of intellectual property rights, Austrian law provides for remedies such as an action for preliminary or permanent injunction, compensation, orders for disposal and destruction or publication of the judgement. The holder of rights may also initiate criminal proceedings against the infringer in various intentional cases.

However, Ambush Marketing campaigns are usually short-lived. Those associated with the 2010 World Cup will end in July when the event ends. That means that a court injunction would probably come too late. Even preliminary injunctions do not provide for much protection in the ambush competition. Ambush Marketing cases are therefore rarely actionable and the claimant will usually be referred to damages - but damages are hard to prove.

Schoenherr

Contacts

Ruth Brandsttter T: +43 1 534 37 4079 E: r.brandstaetter@schoenherr.at

Margit Nemetz +43 1 534 37 125 E: m.nemetz@schoenherr.at

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   

Protect Your Bright Ideas With an IP Lawyer

To make sure that the fundamental ideas that your business has been created upon are protected, you should seek the services of an intellectual property ('IP') lawyer. UK IP law differs from other countries, so this article is only relevant to the current situation in the UK.

In today's world, more businesses than ever are built around a bright idea. The UK has steadily moved from its product based markets to service based markets, thus meaning that intangible ideas and processes are what excels one company from another.

It is not always as obvious as patenting a new product (such a the man who patented his better bedspring invention) some IP is more discreet, for example software developments and graphic designs. Protecting your intellectual property is fast becoming one of the most important steps to take for businesses to be a success.

The issue is an increasingly important one, particularly for small business owners. Many set up their business or go self-employed in order to further develop ideas of their own, in a particular sector where they have specialist experience or expertise. Few set out with an endgame in mind; unless the new ideas are protected there will be little capital raised from selling the business when it comes to a retirement age. Getting expert advice about your IP is a way that you can ensure that your business has a long term value as well as the owner.

The most pro active way of finding out which unique features of your business need protection is to speak to a legal expert. An intellectual property solicitor will help you define what makes your business unique, and establish the extent to which it can be patented, copyrighted or otherwise protected from those who may wish to help themselves to your competitive advantage by copying your achievement, or otherwise trying to benefit from the hard work of development that you have invested in.

A UK IP lawyer will look at your business, the processes you employ and the outputs you create, and decide on the best way to protect them; working out what can be argued as unique, special or different in order to establish a value from the detail of what you do. Protecting your intellectual property can be extremely valuable, as having done this, you are in a much stronger position to defend your business against those who might seek to copy or undermine it in the future. The process will protect you from you previous employees creating rival businesses to compete against you.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   Why You Need a Loan Modification Attorney When Your House Is On The Line   

Intellectual Property: The Risk of Inaction

Copyright, in its simplest term, refers to the rights bestowed through legislation to protect an individual or business from their work being unlawfully replicated. They bestow rights to the owner in relation to specific activities surrounding the use and communication of copyrighted material. To satisfy the eligibility criteria of being awarded a copyright, several conditions must be satisfied, including that the 'work' must fit into one of the set categories of copyrightable materials; it must be original; the individual(s) or businesses charged with creating must be qualified to do so; and the 'work' must be in some type of written form for verification processes. Copyright law covers a wide range of categories, including literary, musical, dramatic and artistic works; musical works and broadcasts; goods, services, business processes, brands and the like.

Of increasing importance in today's knowledgeable economy is protecting your own and your business's intellectual property (IP). New Zealand is party to the international TRIPS Agreement, which is a specific legislation relating to trade related aspects of intellectual property rights. The internet, and its ability to spread and disseminate information at ever increasing rates, and with increasing ease of access, has created an environment where protecting IP has never been so vital. The risk of releasing new ideas, products or designs without the proper intellectual property registration can result in infringements of existing copyright patents. In New Zealand, violating IP laws may result in large monetary demands to resolve the situation, while additional losses may be experienced in relation to the advertising and marketing activities surrounding the product or brand promotion. Furthermore, with the correct intellectual property protection in place, there is the risk that some other organisation may copy the idea, repackage the product or design, and earn market share and revenue from your work.

It is strongly recommended that thorough searches are conducted through patent and copyright databases prior to commitment of resources to develop and protect IP. This is to ensure that the concept being developed does not infringe on any current patents, as well as provide valuable information in relation to similar or competing ideas. This knowledge is then utilised to further develop the concept, idea or product to better satisfy the market being targeted and differentiate the concept to not only develop a unique selling proposition, but to differentiate the concept from other patented intellectual property.

This process can be time consuming, with those not familiar with New Zealand IP law and the tools to search for existing patents, running the risk of not accessing complete knowledge on the numbers and types of current copyrights which relate to the concept in question. The best way forward is to utilise a reputable and professional company which specialises in copyright applications. This will ensure that your intellectual remains under your ownership, while avoiding any expensive litigation which may result from copyright violations.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   Why You Need a Loan Modification Attorney When Your House Is On The Line   

Trademark Versus Copyright: Which Applies to Your Content?

In my work, I encounter this particular confusion quite regularly - clients (and adverse parties) seem to think that copyright applies to both a website and its domain name. But this belief is incorrect. Here's a simple, easy way to remember it:

Copyrights are for Content. Trademarks are for goods/services.

So, a client can claim a copyright in the content written on a blog, a website, etc. However, you can't claim a "copyright" in the domain name that hosts your website: it's not really content. It could be, however, a name linked to your goods or to a service that you provide. If so, you can claim trademark rights in that name.

[Note that these rights usually apply whether you register with the Federal government or not! But registration certainly helps your arguments later on, if it comes to that...]

For further information, the US Copyright Office website has a document that explains in greater detail what kind of things can get copyright protections, including literary, musical, and dramatic works. And, likewise, the US Patent and Trademark Office (usually abbreviated USPTO, or just PTO) has a document that explains trademarks in greater detail - it describes them as "a word, phrase, symbol, or design, or a combination thereof, that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods [or services] of one party from those of others...." Each US state may also offer trademark or copyright registrations, typically at a lower filing cost, although the usefulness of local registrations may not be great as federal registrations.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   Why You Need a Loan Modification Attorney When Your House Is On The Line   Intellectual Property Lawyers and How to Tackle IP Litigation   

Execution of Improved Patents

Scenario:

Company A has a formerly granted patent PA on product P1 while company B has a latter granted patent PB on product P2, which is am improvement on product P1.

Solution:

Normal execution of the above patents is as follows:

If A wants to manufacture P2, then A has to get a license from B, however, if A does not want to manufacture P2, there is no obligation for it to do so. But the most common situation is that because P2 is improved over P1, A feels like to manufacture P2, too, in order to make more benefits, let's say as an example.

If B wants to manufacture P2, in spite of its having the patent on P2, B has to get a license from A for manufacturing P1, too, though in fact what B produces is absolutely P2 but not P1. The reason why B has to get a license from A for manufacturing P1 is that PB falls within the claimed field of PA despite PB's improvement over PA.

So, typical solution is more often like this:

A gets a license for manufacturing P2 from B, meanwhile B gets a license for manufacturing P1 from A which then makes B be able to implement its patent PB. It's usually called a 'CROSS-LICENSE'.

What should 3rd party do?

As to a 3rd party that wants to manufacture P2, it has to get license both from A and B, of course, or else it may be sued by A or B. If it just wants to manufacture P1, a license from A only is enough.

Keywords: patent improvement license cross-license

P.S.: here, 'it' in this article means nothing offending just for representing convenience.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   

Intellectual Property Solicitors - Why They Are Worth Every Penny

Intellectual property (IP) is anything which has been created in the mind of an individual that is protected under IP law. Included in the list of what is protected are songs, written works, designs, inventions and symbols. The means by which people can protect themselves against others copying their intellectual creations come in a number of forms. The most common types are copyright, design rights, trademarks and patents.

IP is one aspect of commercial law that has a large relevance to a lot of companies. Without realising it many companies deal with intellectual property rights on a daily basis. In some cases the ignorance of the rights that others have over a particular design, piece of text or even symbol can cause very complicated and stressful legal issues.

IP law is a very complicate area of commercial law. The lines between copyright or design right infringement and the simple evolution of a design are very ill defined. In order to decide whether copyright has been infringed there often have to be a set number of differences in the design. The number and definition of these differences is something which very much depends on each individual case.

Disputes over whether copyright or a patent has been infringed can have huge implications for the companies involved. If a company is found guilty of infringement then the damages that are incurred can be very substantial. If you are having issues with IP law then by far the best way to address them is to find good intellectual property solicitors to offer advice and representation. Due to the distinctions between intellectual property right infringements being so ill defined, experience counts for everything. Often the only way to get any bearing on whether IP has been abused is to use cases that have gone before as a guide.

In situations like this the experience of specialist intellectual property solicitors will shine through. Using a non specialist solicitor, even if they have extensive experience in commercial or corporate law, will leave you at a distinct disadvantage, both in the lead up, and in the courtroom itself. Another reason to use specialist intellectual property solicitors is the level of service they will provide. Their particular understanding of IP law will mean that they are far better qualified to explain the situation to you. With this greater understanding of your situation you will be able to make better informed decisions, as well as feeling much more relaxed about the legal situation you are in. When the stakes are so high, using the most experienced and knowledgeable intellectual property solicitors possible will make the whole process far less stressful for you.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   Why You Need a Loan Modification Attorney When Your House Is On The Line   Intellectual Property Lawyers and How to Tackle IP Litigation   

What Does A Patent Lawyer Do?

If you are considering a new invention, a patent lawyer is needed to protect your idea. While most people understand that a patent is necessary to keep others from stealing your ideas, many are unclear as to what a patent lawyer does. Here is what to expect from a lawyer who works in patent litigation.

The patent application process is very complex and can be difficult to navigate. In order to ensure that your information is properly protected, the patent lawyer will help you walk through the navigation process. A good one will help you decipher to nuances of patent law, and make sure that you understand the laws as well. It is said that every successful business launched on a new idea was protected by a lawyer. In other words, the person responsible for the invention did not fill out his or her own patent application. The lawyer's assistance can be invaluable.

Remember, however, that this cannot be any generic attorney. A patent lawyer specializes in a very complicated specialty. If you want control over your ideas, you need to hire one. Otherwise, someone else may find a loophole in your application and steal your idea out from under you.

This protection makes a big difference. If your idea is not protected adequately, you will be more protective of it. But if you have a valid patent, you are more free to discuss your idea with others, knowing that it is yours. However, if an application is poorly-written, you may have the illusion and feeling of security. Then, if you act that way and you actually are not secure, you may wind up losing your idea, and the potential that comes with it.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   

DIY Correspondence With the USPTO

I.Introduction

Due predominantly to technology advances over the past few decades-the computer and Internet, above all-consumers of legal services have become more sophisticated in determining exactly what they need from an attorney. Moreover, there is much more legal information available to the general public. Therefore, more and more lay people are representing themselves in their own matters, whether it be setting up a corporation, registering a copyright, or even litigating.

In my opinion, this is a mistake. Most first-year attorneys know just enough law to cause a lot of trouble for themselves and their clients, regardless of the underlying legal matter. Sure, that first-year attorney will likely work his way out of that trouble, but it can be a long rollercoaster ride, and somebody will have to pay for it. The level of trouble caused can be increased exponentially with a lay person who has never attended so much as a day of law school.

Regardless of my opinion, this is the world we live in. It is your right as a United States citizen to represent yourself on your own matters before any governmental body. Of course, it is also your responsibility should anything go wrong. You will not be able to claim ignorance to the court. That might find you some wiggle room in motion practice, but never works with more serious matters, such as securities, patent, trademark, and contracts. Again, think long and hard about what you are "saving" or otherwise "getting" in exchange for representing yourself on a serious legal matter. And follow the advice that I received as a first-year associate from one of the most senior partners of the firm: he looked at me with a fatherly smile and said, "Whatever else you might do, don't mess it up."

II.Correspondence with the USPTO

When dealing with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the "USPTO") about registering your trademark, it may be difficult to know what is expected of you. The good news is that you are not unique: everything you are attempting has already been accomplished (or restricted) hundreds or thousands of times before this moment. Hence, for every question you have about a characteristic of your trademark, there are a multitude of marks with that same characteristic.

A.Registering A Composite Mark

For example, an applicant to the USPTO may have a composite mark that incorporates words in stylized font (the brand name) with a graphic and sometimes a slogan to be used on a variety of classes, such as pants, collared shirts, and t-shirts. With so many elements, the applicant might only fit the words in stylized font on the hangtag of all three items, the graphic on the front of the collared shirt (e.g., Lacoste's crocodile), and all the elements on the front of the t-shirts. So the applicant wants to know whether to file one or more applications with the USPTO.

The first step is to brainstorm marks that have these elements of a brand name, graphic, and slogan. This may take a lay person a long time to perform the research through Google, going through one's closet, watching television commercials, or whathaveyou. But keep in mind that these characteristics are not particular to clothing. One relevant mark would be RINGLING BROS. BARNUM AND BAILEY CIRCUS, which has the "globe" graphic and the slogan, "The Greatest Show on Earth." Another mark would be BUDWEISER, which has the eagle emblem with the slogan, "King of Beers."

Once you have thought of an established mark that shares your situation, go to www.uspto.gov, "Search Marks," and perform a "New User Search Form" for that mark. Make sure you view only the "Live" results, so that you do not unwittingly repeat a mistake from a mark that is "Dead" because it did something wrong in the application process.

Once at the mark's page, you will see four cells across the top labeled "TARR Status," "ASSIGN Status," "TDR," and "TTAB Status." Click on "TDR," which stands for "Trademark Document Retrieval." Once there, you can look through the applications, specimens, and all correspondence.

Of course, because you are viewing how an established company prosecuted their application, it will seem that they spared no expense. For instance, Ringling Bros. has several marks: the stylized brand name, the graphic, and the slogan; just the slogan; just the brand name; the graphic and the slogan; etc. Each mark cost them a minimum of $275 in government fees, plus what they spent in legal fees.

Assuming money is an object for you, you may want to file one mark with all the elements. If a competitor starts using one of the elements, you may have a cause of action for infringement. Alternatively, you may want to file the word mark as your primary brand indicator upon which to build. But this depends on too many factors that are particular to your situation. Giving specific advice in a general article like this is a "one-size-fits-none" prospect. Stating, "All start-up companies looking to save money on trademark applications should feel comfortable filing x," is too risky for an attorney. Such a statement is simply untrue for a significant percentage of businesses. This is why attorneys have that annoying habit of responding to such questions with, "It depends. Here's my card if you want to call me and talk about it." It might be annoying, but it is the best advice a responsible lawyer can give.

B.Opposing a Registration and Other More Complicated Matters

Such research may work for more complicated trademark issues, as well. Naturally, the more involved the issue, the more involved the research.With something like an opposition to a trademark, you could easily spend hours upon hours looking in the TDR sections of a multitude of marks before finding anything remotely useful.

In these situations, you should remember that the USPTO probably has some guidelines or even sample forms for you to use. A case in point arises when you wish to oppose a registration. Here, you would want to poke around the USPTO website to see if anything is on point. This should lead you to "File Forms Online." After looking through all the forms available to see which are most applicable, you should arrive at "Letter of Protest" under "Petition Forms." This should get you going.

Finally, as frustrating as it might be, you can always call the government directly. The people at the USPTO are actually quite friendly, albeit overworked. Expect to be on the phone for a while.

As to the specifics of what to put into the correspondence to the USPTO and what evidence to include for your opposition... well, it depends.

III.Conclusion

It always sounds a bit disingenuous for an attorney to say, "You need an attorney." As they say, to a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. However, the reason there are attorneys that do only trademark is because there are very sophisticated issues at every stage of the trademark application process.

Surely, you can blast something off to the USPTO and hope for the best. But a good attorney will be able to collect the entire universe of significant facts about your personal and specific situation. These facts will be used to make sure that you do not do too little to protect your mark.

Also, with trademark, you have to be careful not to do too much, either. For example, when filing a TEAS Plus application, you might be tempted to select all the options given under a specific International Class. However, claiming items under an International Class for which you are not engaged in commerce can void your entire application, even years after you have established exclusive use. Therefore, proceed carefully.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   

Do You Need a Lawyer to Respond to a UDRP?

UDRP stands for Uniform domain name Dispute Resolution Policy, and was created by ICANN, the governing body of "the Internet" (generally speaking) to assist trademark owners with combating unauthorized infringement of their marks used in domain names. The practice of "cybersquatting" on a registered trademark was used to great extent in the early days of the Web, with squatters attempting to leverage domain name registrations into big cash payouts (this is obviously very different from legitimate domain name "development"). The US Congress stepped in and cybersquatting was outlawed, but it's still expensive to go to court and pay a lawyer just to stop someone from abusing your trademark in their domain name.

This is where the UDRP comes in. It is an arbitration process and is fast, inexpensive, and (usually) gets positive results for trademark owners. The process recently went all-email, so now it's even environmentally friendly. For a reasonable cost, a trademark owner can obtain a very fast resolution of their complaint by a neutral decision maker appointed with one of the UDRP providers (WIPO & NAF are the most popular). You can choose to have a one or three member panel appointed to decide the case (costs go up for three member panels, obviously).

As a lawyer who works on these sorts of issues, it takes me about a week to prepare a complaint or response. A panel will usually render a decision within about 30-45 days. After that, assuming the trademark owner was awarded the domain name, there's a 10 day period for the domain name registrant to challenge the decision in court (in my experience, very rare/never happens) and then you send instructions to the registrar to effect the transfer. That's really all there is to it.

If you have a trademark, and you've got some domain names but issues with squatters, you don't have to be represented by a lawyer, but you do need to contact someone with experience making legal arguments in writing. And that's why I think you need a trained lawyer, with experience dealing with UDRP issues. But just because you need a lawyer, doesn't mean that you should go to a big law firm, where you can usually expect to pay much higher fees. It might have real value to have a big law firm in your corner if you are involved in a dispute in court, but if cybersquatting is the problem you are dealing with, you don't want to go to court, you want to file a UDRP and get it over with. A small firm or solo practitioner can provide you with the same caliber of work product for a fraction of the cost.

What Is the Protection of Business Names Under Intellectual Property Law?   Hire Patent and Trademark Attorney to Accelerate the IPR Procedure   Every Innovative Irish Idea Deserves to Be Protected Correctly in Law   Intellectual Property Infringement and Patent Law   

Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Français Deutsch Italiano Português
Español 日本語 한국의 中国简体。